iscussion conceives a five-step method and a sentence pattern guide
The discussion of scientific research issues is deep and broad, defining the value of SCI articles, and becoming the inspiration of authors. How do you turn this thoughtful thought into a document? Renowned scholar Professor James Hartley provides the answer, his “five-step method” not only provides a clear structure, but also provides a template to help you achieve the artistic creation of your thesis.
The writing steps are as follows:
1. Describe the research summary and results
2. Compare the existing literature to explain the unique contribution and progress of this paper
3. Reveal potential limitations of the study
4. Suggest possible solutions
5. Make new assumptions and suggestions
It is worth mentioning that the discussion section often does not need subheadings. Pay attention to various key words and phrases to ensure smooth writing.
To complete the thesis, be sure to leave enough time, so as not to overlook the necessary revision due to the tight time. I wish you a successful thesis, graduation worry!
In view of the lack of discussion, add some common sentences:
In a word, judging from the discussion, it can be concluded that… From what has been discussed above, it may be inferred that… Although these studies reveal significant findings, there are still limitations first, second, third, fourth, and finally, across the board.
2. When comparing results: This result is very consistent with previous research. This study confirms that x vs. There is a connection. Comparing our findings with other studies, we confirm. When comparing our results with older studies, it is important to note. These basic findings echo the conclusions of the study. These findings show that.
3. When discussing research theories and methods: This paper carries out theoretical and experimental research on xxx process and yyy concept. In summary, the theory provides an alternative basis for xxx analysis in fuzzy environments. This study attempts to introduce xx Method. The above factors may explain the relatively good correlation between X and Y.
4. Explain the value and limitations of the study: Unfortunately, it is difficult to determine this from the current data. Our results are still lacking. Despite its limitations, the study does suggest “. The limitation of these methods is that they… Although the study is preliminary in nature, it is enough to make it clear that… These findings suggest that… Many questions have emerged from these findings. These findings provide an explanation as to why the reasons are encouraged.
5. When making speculation and suggestions: An important direction of future development may be. As a result, future versions of xx may actually be more powerful. It is expected that the experimental research results can be used as useful feedback information to improve XX’s work. Potential research questions include… There are still a number of unanswered questions.
